Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 66--72

A comparative evaluation of flexural strengths of two different chairside repair materials with and without modification of implant attachment housings: An in vitro study


Abhinav Agarwal, Manesh Lahori, Kushal Singh 
 Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, K. D. Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Abhinav Agarwal
K. D. Dental College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh
India

Statement of Problem: Implant overdentures become thinner and weaker after direct transfer of implant attachment housings. The introduction of a metal housing changes the character of the repair as denture has to be relieved to provide space for the housings; therefore, a strong method of repair is desirable to avoid prosthesis fracture. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare flexural strength of two different chairside repair materials with and without modification of implant attachment housings. Materials and Methods: Eighty 13 mm × 10 mm × 41 mm heat-polymerized acrylic resin blocks were processed, assessed for porosities, and polished. An 8.5-mm diameter hole was created to a depth of 5 mm in the center of each block. Two different attachment housings sandblasted and nonsandblasted were placed into the blocks with two different repair materials: autopolymerized acrylic resin (APAR) and light-polymerized acrylic resin. Later blocks were immersed in water for 7 days in an incubator. A three-point bend test was done in a universal testing machine, and load to fracture was recorded (MPa). Results were compared with one-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Results: The mean maximum strength of APAR groups was significantly higher than light-polymerized acrylic resin groups. Groups with sandblasted attachment housings showed significantly higher strength compared to nonsandblasted groups. Conclusions: The flexural strength of self-cured acrylic resin with and without sandblasting of attachment was significantly higher than light-cured acrylic resin with and without sandblasting of attachment housings. Sandblasting produced higher flexural strength in denture blocks repaired with self-cured acrylic.


How to cite this article:
Agarwal A, Lahori M, Singh K. A comparative evaluation of flexural strengths of two different chairside repair materials with and without modification of implant attachment housings: An in vitro study.J Interdiscip Dentistry 2019;9:66-72


How to cite this URL:
Agarwal A, Lahori M, Singh K. A comparative evaluation of flexural strengths of two different chairside repair materials with and without modification of implant attachment housings: An in vitro study. J Interdiscip Dentistry [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 22 ];9:66-72
Available from: http://www.jidonline.com/article.asp?issn=2229-5194;year=2019;volume=9;issue=2;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Agarwal;type=0