J Interdiscip Dentistry
Home | About JID | Editors | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions |
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 821  | Login  | Contact us | Advertise | Subscribe  


 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 54-55

Gingival displacement in prosthodontics: A critical review of existing methods


Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal University, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication22-Mar-2012

Correspondence Address:
Vidya K Shenoy
Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal University, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-5194.94197

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Shenoy VK. Gingival displacement in prosthodontics: A critical review of existing methods. J Interdiscip Dentistry 2012;2:54-5

How to cite this URL:
Shenoy VK. Gingival displacement in prosthodontics: A critical review of existing methods. J Interdiscip Dentistry [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jun 16];2:54-5. Available from: http://www.jidonline.com/text.asp?2012/2/1/54/94197

Dear Editor,

In their JID article (July-December), Dr. Krishna Prasad and colleagues critically reviewed various methods of gingival displacement in prosthodontics [1] . This article was well-written, well-covered and recent contribution from the literature is well-reflected in it.

This will help practicing dentists to make better-informed decisions regarding the current options and materials available for gingival displacement. In tissue hierarchy, teeth act as protagonists followed by soft tissue and bone topography. Bone gives tone but it is the tissue which is always the issue.

Certainly, tissue management is one of the most critical factors in ensuring a high-quality impression and in turn, successful restoration. As no one method satisfies all clinical requirements, clinicians should consider the merits and demerits of each method, planned restoration for the individual patient, and strive for minimally-invasive methods, while at the same time preserving periodontal health.

As Devan rightly said, "Perpetual preservation of what is remaining is more important than meticulous reconstruction of what is lost". [2] To add on, the four forces involved in the deformation of gingival tissues during retraction and impression procedures have been explained well in the article "Gingival retraction techniques for implant Vs teeth" by Vincent Bennani [3] and colleagues in the Journal of American Dental Association 2008 which will give additional information to the readers.

Finally, in most cases, gingival retraction cord is the most effective method of gingival displacement and the recent innovations in the form of cordless gingival displacement techniques have made minimally-invasive soft-tissue management an achievable reality.

 
   References Top

1.Prasad KD, Hegde C, Agrawal G, Shetty M. Gingival displacement in prosthodontics: A critical review of existing methods. J Interdiscip Dentistry 2011;1:80-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
  Medknow Journal  
2.DeVan MM. The nature of the partial denture foundation: suggestions for its preservation. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2:210-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Bennani V, Schwass D, Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth- Current status. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1354-63.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2061    
    Printed66    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded477    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal